Developer's Response to Controversy Over 11 Bed, 11 Bath Being Built in East Long Beach

After the interest shown in last week's article explaining resident's concerns over the proposed development project at 6481 El Roble which can be viewed here, we decided it was only fair to cover both sides of the story. Here is a Q& A with Dan Lewin, Long Beach resident and 6481 El Roble St. Developer:

How long have you owned the property at 6481 El Roble and when did you first realize it could become an investment opportunity?

We bought it in 2019 always with the idea in mind to develop it. When California made new powerful changes to ADU laws last year to combat the housing crisis, we realized this was a great opportunity. This is not our only property that we’re doing this - it’s one of about 12 so far we’re completing in multiple cities. We have one in Silicon Valley, a few in Whittier, Redondo Beach, Downtown Long Beach, a couple by Cal State Long Beach, and a couple by Chapman University.

With this law being so new, how did you even become a part of this? How did you decide you wanted to pioneer ADU investing?

My background is as a real estate broker. I went to USC and then started at Long Beach’s own Marcus and Millichap firm, whose office is in downtown Long Beach.

Since beginning my career, my niche has always been specializing in student housing, specifically around USC. I’m currently the most active real estate agent around the USC Campus.

I’ve seen over the course of the last several years, how the market plays out when it comes to developing student housing around college campuses. I’ve worked a lot with buyers and sellers there, and have made many home sellers, and investment buyers realize what a massive value a home has in the neighborhoods surrounding USC, if it’s developed as a student-housing investment property as opposed to a single-family home.

With the passage of these ADU laws I realized there was an opportunity to create similar investment strategies near other Universities who have not developed adequate student housing near their campuses. Long Beach State is a prime example.

A lot of the neighbors in La Marina Estates here in Long Beach are furious over your proposed development. What is your side of the story you don’t feel they understand?

We are solving a market need here. Look, I am a for-profit investor. That’s my job. My first responsibility is to do what’s in the best interest of my clients who I’m working very hard for. That’s what got me into this market.

However, I have come to realize how much of a need there is for affordable student housing. Student housing belongs near campuses. It’s that simple. It makes sense for the environment, for traffic, and it is the most fair practice for young people to have the best possible learning environment while they attend a University and try to better their lives.

I came to realize that there’s this debate behind the scenes in our society that frankly I was not really aware of but I realized, you can slice it a lot of different ways, you can put a lot of different spins on it, but the affordable housing crisis in California is an easy concept to understand. We’ve got too much demand and not enough supply. We’re three million houses short in California and that’s why these powerful new ADU laws were put in place to help solve that shortage in supply of affordable housing.

Do you think that La Marina Estates being a traditionally family neighborhood that people have worked hard to buy into changes the argument? Do you think the El Roble situation is an unintended consequence of the law?

No, I think what the ADU laws were designed for exactly is this type of situation. The state realized that local governance and policy is a failed operation when it comes to our housing crisis because local controls allow local interests to fight it, and so it’s become very hard to find homes. This is a perfect example of a “NIMBY” group fighting against more housing which is why we’re in this situation in the first place.

Why do we define family neighborhood as exclusively residential, one home on a lot development? There’s nothing inherently traditional about this, look at the older neighborhoods of long beach and elsewhere, where duplexes and apartments are mixed in with single family. Are these not family neighborhoods? This mindset has allowed single family homeowners to exercise veto power over land use regulation for years.

Look, I’m 28 years old, my business partner is 29. We sympathize with these tenants. These tenants are old enough to be our younger siblings. A couple years ago we were sharing a two-bed apartment in Belmont Shore. We know what it’s like to need housing, to want an affordable rent, and to want a comfortable living situation near your school or work.

Our feeling is the undersupply of housing is a generational tax. We shouldn’t restrict housing where we need it for young people. Yes, we are a for-profit company, but we’re providing a basic need in our community- comfortable roommate living in a nice, safe neighborhood.

We feel we know this area of the market very well. What happens when young people are sharing homes and living as roommates